Xiaohu, Fred, >> Oh, I may have read too fast; I see now that you are only asking >> about stateless at the current time. But, why not also do stateful >> DHCPv6 prefix delegation (and maybe also stateful DHCPv6 address >> configuration)? A 6rd tunnel should be able to support that the same >> as for an ISATAP tunnel. >> Then, 6rd end sites can use true native IPv6 prefixes instead of the >> IPv4-embedded ones. Should this be added to the draft? > > I agree that it should work. However, I wonder what's the advantage of > native IPv6 prefixes over IPv4-embeded ones?
I also agree that it should work (and should be a requirement for a solution). similar to "BGP tunnelling (aka softwire mesh), any of the automatic tunnelling mechanisms could be used as transport for "native addressed" IPv6 service (e.g. ISATAP, 6to4, 6rd, ...). cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
