Hello Yiu,
Yes, some apps break by NAT64. We're going to document it.
BR,
Xiaohong
opensource A+P: http://opensourceaplusp.weebly.com/
________________________________
发件人: Lee, Yiu [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2011年4月7日 22:11
收件人: DENG Xiaohong ESP/PEK; [email protected]
主题: Re: [Softwires] FW:[Int-area] Stateless IPv4-in-IPv6 experiments &&
DS-Lite/NAT64 experiments
Hi Xiaohong,
I am personally very interested in the data. Do you also document what
may break the applications?
Thanks,
Yiu
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:31:42 +0800
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [Softwires] FW:[Int-area] Stateless IPv4-in-IPv6 experiments
&& DS-Lite/NAT64 experiments
We have tested how applications behave when it has both DS-Lite IPv4
and NAT64 IPv6 (but not native IPv6). Firefox, IE, Skype, Google Earth v5.2.1,
Live Messenger, uTorrent, BitComet, were on our test list.
Despres,regarding your question ( maybe not answering your question
exactly as we tested NAT64 IPv6 instead of native IPv6 ), uTorrent v2.2 used
IPv6 for login/authentication but IPv4 for the data exchange, for IPv6 peer was
not able to talk to IPv4 peer. Although BitComet v1.23 issued both A and AAAA
quires, it completely ignored AAAA RR and only used IPv4 for communication.
Please also see some of other test results below. DS-Lite/NAT64
experiments could be documented if it is of interests.
Tested Apps IPv4/IPv6 portion
Firefox (Non-vedio) v3.6.12 All IPv6
video website Half/ half
IE (Non-vedio) v6.0 All IPv6
Skype v5.0 Major IPv6
Google Earth v5.2.1 Major IPv6
Live Messenger 2009 Major IPv4
uTorrent v2.2 Major IPv4
BitComet v1.23 All IPv4
BR,
Xiaohong
opensource A+P: http://opensourceaplusp.weebly.com/
________________________________
发件人: Rémi Després [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2011年4月7日 0:21
收件人: DENG Xiaohong ESP/PEK
抄送: [email protected]
主题: Re: [Int-area] Stateless IPv4-in-IPv6 experiments
Thank you, Xiahong, for sharing this interesting information.
In the case of BitComet and uTorrent, I wonder what happens if
the host has both A+P IPv4 and IPv6, as opposed to just A+P IPv4.
Did you try that?
Regards,
RD
Le 6 avr. 2011 à 10:57, <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> a écrit :
Dear all,
An I-D about stateless IPv4-in-IPv6 experiments has
been submitted. A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-aplusp-experiment-results-00
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-aplusp-experiment-results-00> .
A website introducing the detail of experiment results
is also accessible via: http://opensourceaplusp.weebly.com/
<http://opensourceaplusp.weebly.com/>
BR,
Xiaohong
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list
[email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
