On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 10:30:02AM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > Title : Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 > Exhaustion > Author(s) : A. Durand, et al. > Filename : draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite-08.txt
7.2. VPN Dual-stack lite implementations MUST NOT interfere with the functioning of IPv4 or IPv6 VPNs. This "MUST NOT" was "SHOULD NOT" in -07. What's the motivation for that change? Is there a specific problem/scenario which is supposed to be solved? How is a DS-Lite implementation supposed to not interfere e.g. with IPSEC-AH (and other VPN types having inherent problems with NAPT44)? Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [email protected] -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
