+1 Operators love to keep stateless options for simple and robust operations.
cheers! asaba > +1 > Stateless protocols are easy to implement. > > > Thanks, > Tomoyuki > > >From: <[email protected]> > >Date: Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:03 PM > >Subject: Re: [Softwires] Next step for Stateless Motivations I-D > > > > > >+1 > > > >Cheers, > >Xiaohong. > > > >open source PCP Client, > >open source A+P > >http://opensourcev6transtechnologies.weebly.com/ > > > >| > >|+1 > >| > >|Tetsuya Murakami wrote: > >|> +1 > >|> > >|> On 2011/07/06, at 8:23, GangChen wrote: > >|> > >|>> +1 > >|>> > >|>> > >|>> 2011/7/6, Lee, Yiu<[email protected]>: > >|>>> +1 > >|>>> > >|>>> On 7/6/11 10:33 AM, "Rajiv Asati > >|(rajiva)"<[email protected]> wrote: > >|>>> > >|>>>> Support. > >|>>>> > >|>>>> Cheers, > >|>>>> Rajiv > >|>>>> > >|>>>> > >|>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >|>>>>> From: Satoru Matsushima [mailto:[email protected]] > >|>>>>> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 2:32 AM > >|>>>>> To:<[email protected]> > >|>>>>> Cc: Satoru Matsushima; Softwires-wg; 'Softwire Chairs'; > >|Lee, Yiu; > >|>>>>> [email protected]; [email protected]; > >|>>>> [email protected] > >|>>>>> Subject: Re: Next step for Stateless Motivations I-D > >|>>>>> > >|>>>>> Dear Softwires Working Group chairs, > >|>>>>> > >|>>>>> I support that an request from Mohamed to make WG adoption as > >|>>>> appropriate > >|>>>>> charter item. > >|>>>>> I'm looking forward you to take your kind adoption procedure for > >|>>>>> the > >|>>>> request. > >|>>>>> > >|>>>>> Sincerely yours, > >|>>>>> > >|>>>>> -- > >|>>>>> Satoru Matsushima > >|>>>>> > >|>>>>> > >|>>>>> On 2011/06/10, at 20:31,<[email protected]> > >|>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >|>>>>> > >|>>>>>> Dear all, > >|>>>>>> > >|>>>>>> An updated version of the "Motivations for Stateless IPv4 over > >|>>>>>> IPv6 > >|>>>>> Migration Solutions" I-D has been submitted. The document is > >|>>>>> available > >|>>>> at: > >|>>>>>> > >|http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-operators-softwire-stateless-4v6 > >|>>>>>> - > >|>>>>> motivation-02 > >|>>>>>> > >|>>>>>> This document has been largely reviewed and inputs from other > >|>>>> contributors > >|>>>>> has been taken into account. > >|>>>>>> > >|>>>>>> Together with my co-authors, we ask the working group > >|to consider > >|>>>> the > >|>>>>> adoption of this document as a WG I-D. > >|>>>>>> > >|>>>>>> Comments and suggestions are more than welcome. > >|>>>>>> > >|>>>>>> Cheers, > >|>>>>>> Med > >|>>>> > >|>>> > >|>>> _______________________________________________ > >|>>> Softwires mailing list > >|>>> [email protected] > >|>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > >|>>> > >|>> _______________________________________________ > >|>> Softwires mailing list > >|>> [email protected] > >|>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > >|> > >|> _______________________________________________ > >|> Softwires mailing list > >|> [email protected] > >|> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > >|> > >| > >| > >| > >| > >_______________________________________________ > >Softwires mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
