Le 21 juil. 2011 à 06:09, Jacni Qin a écrit :

> Hi Remi,
> 
> Thanks, inline please,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Rémi Després <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Hi, Jacni,
> 
> ...
> 
> In addition to Satoru's answer, an ISP that has many IPv4 prefixes can:
> - use only a few, or even only one, of its shortest IPv4 prefixes, and
> - use IPv4 address sharing to support as many CE's as needed. 
> 
> Example: an ISP has a /10, a /11, another /11, a /14, a /15, and a /16 (a 
> real example I met).
> It can:
> - use three domains (the /10 and the two /11's), or
> - use only the /10, extending Port-set ID by one bit to support as many CE's
> In both cases, no entropy due to the fragmented IPv4 space needs to be 
> exported to the IPv6 addressing plan.
> 
> Jacni>: Ok, I got you point, 

Thanks.

> Another question is to make sure that continuous IPv6 pools (with EA) are 
> assigned on multiple Access Gateways (BNG) within the same 4rd domain.

I don't understand the question.
Could you clarify?

> Plus, the reality is even more complicated,
> For example, there are group/HQ and branches. The shorter prefixes are 
> probably held by the group level, and several/many 4rd domains (according to 
> the sizes of cities under given branch) will be maintained by the branches 
> who can only get fragmented spaces, since a large amount of these spaces come 
> from leftover prefixes returned.

Again, not sure to get the question.
The simple approach is "one IPv6 prefix" => "one 4rd prefix" (no fragmented 
spaces).
Changing the length of one changes the length of the other.

Cheers,
RD



 

> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Jacni
> 
> 
> Leftover IPv4 prefixes can then be returned to the community (for free... or 
> for a price, whatever applies).
>   
> Regards,
> RD
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Jacni
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Softwires mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to