Hi,
On 8/16/2011 11:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
...
As for the content of the next iteration of the document, we have two options
so far:
(1) Put back some sections which have been removed in -02, add a new section to
discuss dynamic vs. static, handle the comments received from J. Arkko, etc.
Or
2) An alternative structure has been proposed off-line by A. Durand: discuss
dynamic vs. static and stateful vs. dynamic. The analysis would elaborate the
pros and cons of each solution (static stateless, static stateful, dynamic
stateful,...). This document would be an analysis document and not a motivation
document anymore. This document has no milestone in the charter IMHO. Note the
charter mentions the following:
"Aug 2011 - Adopt stateless legacy IPv4 solution motivation document as a Working
Group document"
I personally think the first option is straightforward but I'm open to the
opinions of the working group members on how to proceed.
In favor of the first.
Cheers,
Jacni
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
