Le 18 août 2011 à 09:18, Washam Fan a écrit :
>>> It seems to me, when delegating CE ipv6 prefix, a longest match might
>>> be used.
>>
>> OK, but, again, if a realistic use case is available where longest match is
>> indeed REQUIRED, there is no problem to impose longest match.
>> What is missing so far is this use case.
>
> can i cite Tetsuya's examples to elaborate that? assume we have three
> below rules
> 1.{2408:db8:100::/40, 10.10.1.0/24, 48}
> 2.{2408:db8:200::/40, 10.10.2.0/24, 48}
> 3.{2408:db8::/32, 10.10.0.0/24, 48}
>
> if a 48 CE prefix is delegated, rule 1 and 2 should be checked against
> before rule 3.
> Although in this case, you can not assign 10.10.0.1 and
> 10.10.0.2 ipv4 addresses to a CE.
Unless I misunderstand, this makes it an unrealistic use case, right?
Cheers,
RD
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
