Dear Jacni,
Thank you for your reply even you are travelling.
Comments in line with [TT] ...


Best Regards,
Tina TSOU
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html


From: Jacni Qin [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 6:48 PM
To: Tina TSOU
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Comments on section 6.3 of 
draft-qin-softwire-dslite-multicast-04

hi,
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Tina TSOU 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear Jacni,
Just after reading RFC 1981, I think fragmentation of IPv6 is needed. In 
section 5.1, it says, "It is possible that a packetization layer, perhaps a UDP 
application outside the kernel, is unable to change the size of messages it 
sends.  This may result in a packet size that exceeds the Path MTU.
To accommodate such situations, IPv6 defines a mechanism that allows large 
payloads to be divided into fragments, with each fragment sent in a separate 
packet (see [IPv6-SPEC] section "Fragment Header")."

If the node which makes PMTU is the multicast source, it can change the size of 
message when the size exceeds the PMTU value.
However, mAFTR, as a router, is unable to change the size of the message. Here 
is an example: An IPv4 packet is sent from the multicast source to mAFTR with 
size of 1000, while the IPv6 PMTU for mAFTR and mB4 is 960, how does mAFTR 
forward the packet? One possible way is to make IPv6 fragmentation, with two 
fragments: one is 960 and the other is 40 with "IPv6 Fragment Header".
In addition, there may be also other ways to avoid fragmentation, e.g., cache 
in mAFTR as defined in [draft-jiang-behave-v4v6mc-proxy].

Jacni>: Please see Yiu's comments,
while for the discovery if you really want to do it, this way to help you to 
understand, it's the end point of tunnel which seems to "source" the v6 
packets. Hope you can get it.

[TT] If you want mAFTR to "source" the v6 packet, you need some mechanism like 
cache to make it happen as I mentioned in my last email. But it is a little bit 
complicated. Anyway, to be more readable, I suggest specify it clearly in the 
draft.


Cheers,
Jacni


_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to