Hello Chairs, I fully agree with Dan's proposal for bashing interim meeting agenda on the following two regards, and thereby raising 3 questions towards current agenda somewhere where against these two regards. Regard 1: Promote stuffs that we can make educated and informed decisions.
Q1: Why http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-softwire-stateless-requiremen ts-00, is off the agenda list? IMO, this is something exactly deals with fundamental requirements for the design of all stateless 4/6 solutions, thereby helping us moving forward to decide working direction. Q2: Why http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-v6ops-aplusp-experiment-results-01 , is off the agenda list? which would offer first-hand information we educated and learnt from pioneer stateless 4/6 solution deployment. Regard 2: Focus on comparisons between approaches instead of going into bits of *only one* of them. Q3: Why http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite-01, is on the list, while the http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhou-softwire-b4-nat-02.txt, which works on exactly the same direction, is off the list? Curious about the reasons and thanks to your answers in advance! Cheers, Xiaohong >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of Alain Durand >> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 8:37 AM >> To: [email protected]; Yong Cui >> Subject: [Softwires] Call for presentations for the interim meeting >> >> As we mentioned earlier, the softwire interim meeting will focus on >> 'stateless solutions'. If you'd like to present there, please send >> the chairs a note by Friday this week. > >After seeing a bunch of replies to this request, I have a feeling of >unease. > >We -- the IETF -- need to reach some decisions on the direction we're >going to move forward. To do that, we need comparisons so we can make >educated and informed decisions. Documents like >draft-bsd-softwire-stateless-port-index-analysis and >draft-dec-stateless-4v6 are on the right track -- I hope we can discuss >them in more detail prior to the interim. > >Can the chairs and presenters please consider spending a majority of >the interim meeting discussing the merits of different approaches, >rather than presentations of >how-this-Internet-Draft-encodes-bits-on-the-wire? > >Wishing for a fruitful Softwire interim meeting, -d _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
