Hi auhtors, I have quick question about your draft.
Section 5 says: > As described above, a stateless 4over6 initiator needs the sub-domain > rule containing subPre6, subPre4 and multiplexing ratio. Since these > parameters are relatively stable, it can be configured in a variety > of provisioning methods, including > DHCPv6[I-D.cui-softwire-dhcp-over-tunnel], "TR-069", etc. For > customer's IPv6 prefix, it will be delegated just in traditional way, > e.g. DHCPv6, Prefix Delegation, etc. And there is no impact on > current IPv6 addressing model. The concentrator address can be > passed through the same option of ds-lite AFTR address. However, section 10 says: > Stateless 4over6 does not need to inform multiple prefix mapping > rules to CPEs directly. Thus, there is no need to introduce dynamic > protocol for distributing and maintaining 4rd rules. This will turn > CPE to be a much simpler/dummier client, which will also > significantly reduce the burden of CPE management and trouble > shooting. In terms of distribution mapping rule, what's the difference between 4over6 and 4rd? It seems both of these could use all options, such as pre-configuration, DHCPv6 and TR-069, etc., I don't see any difference between them. Thought? BTW, thank you for bring this draft before the interim meeting.;) cheers, --satoru _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
