Hi Ole and Remi, > This is my answer to your first (double) question. > > If it is not enough, as suggested below, please explain what you don't > understand. > > I specifically do not want a solution that changes forwarding behaviour for > _all_ IPv6 packets. > e.g. looking at 24 bits in the middle of an IPv6 address is such a change. > > I don't understand what requirements you are basing this 'solution' on. > if the 4rd / dIVI CE takes (a well known or provisioned) /64 prefix out of > the delegated prefix. then why do you need any of that? >
Qiong : I agree that routing lookup for a provisioned /64 prefix would be better that extracting certain bits for each IPv6 address in CE. This would bring less change to existing routing model. Best wishes Qiong _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
