2011/10/20 Jacni Qin <[email protected]> > > ?? i suppose previously with your clarification you HAVE admitted your > consensus to my 1) ~ 4) as the logic of the operation, but now you said > "without considering anything about IPv4". may you clarify your process with > starting from the following example? > > Sorry, maybe there was some misunderstanding between us. > I mean you don't need to consider IPv4 when try to decide the length of > delegated prefix to be assigned to customer. Maybe it was appropriate to use > the word "anything". ;-) > Something should be considered if you need multiple sharing ratios. > > > i allocate: > CE1 2001:db9:8765:4320::/60 > CE2 2001:db8:7654:3210::/60 > then the IPv6 address planning is finished according to your statement. > > then what information should i use to determine the L for each? you mean > the IPv6 address planning is enough? > > Yes. > > your yes is in the case of there is not multiple sharing ratios, right? ;-)
if it is right, i agree with you that the planning is independent of IPv4 knowledge. if there are multiple ratios, i understanding the start of the PSIDs must be aligned among the delegated IPv6 prefixes. best, maoke > Cheers, > Jacni >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
