Hi Dapeng, On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:00 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 2/24/12 7:21 AM, "liu dapeng" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hi Med, > > > >Yes, I am considering CPE. There are two reasons: > > > >1. The definition of "stateless" should not be bind to the provider's > >network. The document should define "stateless" for the Internet not > >only for the operator. > Defining/Attempting "statless" for the Internet would be a bit ambitious IMHO. Consider routing tables on routers, firewall rules on firewall devices, user data base on servers...No means exists to avoid "state" in that sense, thereby invalidating of definition of "statelss for the Internet". Cheers, Xiaohong
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
