Le 2012-03-06 à 19:28, Simon Perreault a écrit : > On 2012-03-06 13:03, Rémi Després wrote: >> In this analysis, the 4rd-u port-set algorithm is presented as an instance >> of GMA algorithm (i.e. Generalized Modulus Algorithm). >> I think it would be more appropriate to have it in its own category, e.g. >> that of "parameter-less" algorithms (it has no reference to any modulo >> operator, and isn't intended to generalize anything) >> It happens to to be alone in this parameter-less category but, since the >> goal is standardization, isn't this more good than evil? > > I'm not sure moving 4rd-U to its own section would be useful for the purposes > of the document. What's important here is the similarity between 4rd-U, MAP, > and divi-pd, not the number of parameters that they use. This similarity > allows us to derive a single summary table containing properties shared by > all of them (section 3.1.4).
No problem > Note that the draft says "GMA-style" algorithms, which gives us some leeway... Well, no big concern. Just making the point that there is no need to understand GMA to understand 4rd-u. Thanks, RD > > Simon > -- > DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca > NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca > STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
