One more note. When we developed this draft, we focused on access network delivery. There is a mesh-multicast draft which also solve the same problem (i.e. Tunneling v4 mcast through v6-only network) in the core network.
On 3/22/12 10:29 PM, "Lee, Yiu" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Stig, > >DS-Lite was designed to deliver v4 unicast packets over v6-only network to >v4 host. However when we started thinking about how to deliver multicast >packets in the same network setup, we will have to tunnel all multicast >packets over tunnels. This is very inefficient to use of AFTR. This is the >motivation of dslite-multicast draft. However, you are absolutely right. >This is a solution for tunneling IPv4 multicast through an IPv6-only >network. > >B.R., >Yiu > >On 3/20/12 4:47 PM, "Stig Venaas" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>I'm a little bit puzzled by how this document talks about DS-Lite. >>Isn't this an entirely generic solution for tunneling IPv4 multicast >>through an IPv6-only network? >> >>Stig >>_______________________________________________ >>Softwires mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >_______________________________________________ >Softwires mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
