Hi, Congxiao, During the Softwire meeting, you came to the mike to assert that the 4rd-U specification was known to have "flaws".
Yet, you do know that the 4rd-U specification has been reviewed by competent contributors of widely varied origin, with no identified flaw left in the draft. Since you have AFAIK made no previous contribution on the mailing list to justify such an assertion, would you be kind enough to explain what, in your understanding, wouldn't work in 4rd-U? Without that, your statement might be understood as an attempt at biasing people's understanding just before a vote (which I suppose you didn't want). Thanks, RD _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
