===================================================================== Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a whole) on the standard track, the other being published as experimental or informational. Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as standard track. Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the standard track.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zhankao WEN, Networking Center of Northeastern University, YES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===================================================================== Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track: 4rd-U or MAP? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Zhankao WEN, Networking Center of Northeastern University, MAP ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ===================================================================== Best regards -- Name: Zhankao WEN(温占考) Email: [email protected] [email protected] Tel&Fax: +86-24-83687240 Address: Networking Center Northeastern University Shenyang Liaoning Province P.R. China (110819) ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alain Durand" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected] WG" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], "Softwire Chairs" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 5:14:08 AM > Subject: [Softwires] Mailing list question to gauge consensus on 4rd-U vs MAP > > Dear Softwire wg members: > > At the Paris IETF Softwire meeting, we had presentations on MAP > (taken as a whole) and > 4rd-U. We got very strong feedback that we needed to select one > solution to cover that full stateless case, not two, and that we > should make this > decision relatively quickly. > > During Paris meeting, we asked the following additional question: > Do you prefer MAP or 4rd-U? > We got about 1/3 support for 4rd-U and 2/3 for MAP. > > The real gauge of consensus is the mailing list, so we would like > to ask the same questions to the list. > > ===================================================================== > Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP > (as a whole) on the standard track, > the other being published as experimental or informational. > Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both > as standard track. > Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on > the standard track. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: YES or NO > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ===================================================================== > > Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards > Track: > 4rd-U or MAP? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: 4rd-U or MAP > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ===================================================================== > > > > > Please fill out the following form and reply to the list > by Wednesday 4/10 5pm EDT. > > Note: Use this thread ONLY for expressing your support to > one OR the other, and redirect any discussions to other threads. > That would help up gauge consensus. > > Alain & Yong. > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
