>>From Alain Durand Wrote: >>Dear Softwire wg members: >>At the Paris IETF Softwire meeting, we had presentations on MAP (taken as a >>whole) and >>4rd-U. We got very strong feedback that we needed to select one >>solution to cover that full stateless case, not two, and that we should make >>this >>decision relatively quickly.
>>During Paris meeting, we asked the following additional question: >>Do you prefer MAP or 4rd-U? >>We got about 1/3 support for 4rd-U and 2/3 for MAP. >>The real gauge of consensus is the mailing list, so we would like >>to ask the same questions to the list. ===================================================================== Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a whole) on the standard track, the other being published as experimental or informational. Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as standard track. Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the standard track. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chen Gang, Zhengzhou University HERNET NOC : YES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===================================================================== Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track: 4rd-U or MAP? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chen Gang, Zhengzhou University HERNET NOC : MAP ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ===================================================================== Chen Gang NOC，ZZU HERNET NOC E-mail:[email protected] Phone:86-371-67767135 _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
