===================================================================== Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a whole) on the standard track, the other being published as experimental or informational. Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as standard track. Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the standard track. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Mouli Chandramouli, Cisco Systems: YES ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ===================================================================== Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track: 4rd-U or MAP? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Mouli Chandramouli, Cisco Systems: MAP ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------
===================================================================== Thanks Mouli -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alain Durand Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 2:44 AM To: [email protected] WG Cc: [email protected]; Softwire Chairs Subject: [Softwires] Mailing list question to gauge consensus on 4rd-U vs MAP Dear Softwire wg members: At the Paris IETF Softwire meeting, we had presentations on MAP (taken as a whole) and 4rd-U. We got very strong feedback that we needed to select one solution to cover that full stateless case, not two, and that we should make this decision relatively quickly. During Paris meeting, we asked the following additional question: Do you prefer MAP or 4rd-U? We got about 1/3 support for 4rd-U and 2/3 for MAP. The real gauge of consensus is the mailing list, so we would like to ask the same questions to the list. ===================================================================== Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a whole) on the standard track, the other being published as experimental or informational. Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as standard track. Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the standard track. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: YES or NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ===================================================================== Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track: 4rd-U or MAP? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: 4rd-U or MAP ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Please fill out the following form and reply to the list by Wednesday 4/10 5pm EDT. Note: Use this thread ONLY for expressing your support to one OR the other, and redirect any discussions to other threads. That would help up gauge consensus. Alain & Yong. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
