In addition, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tsou-softwire-bfd-ds-lite-02 
analyses the applicability of some of the keep-alive mechanisms and try to 
suggest one for DS-Lite scenario.

BFD is a good solution for keep-alive and to trigger failover when a fault is 
detected. Compared to PING and other solutions, BFD is simple and suitable for 
implementation by logic (FPGA, ASIC, etc), while usually PING is handled by 
CPU, which may cause a performance problem if there are too many PING packets. 
BFD can provide more functionalities besides keep-alive, e.g. delay, jitter and 
throughput test, etc.

BBF WT-146 also mandate BFD support for IP sessions. Though as Woj said, PING 
is a SHOULD option.

Sent from my iPad

On May 7, 2012, at 3:35 PM, "Tina TSOU" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Thank u for ur reply, Woj.
Then I think draft-tsou-softwire-bfd-ds-lite-02 is in line with WT-146.
Other comments are welcome.

Sent from my iPad

On May 7, 2012, at 8:28 AM, "Wojciech Dec" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hello,

PING was there, as a SHOULD option.

-Woj.

On 4 May 2012 17:32, Tina TSOU 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
In WT-146, why is there only BFD, no PING?

Sent from my iPad

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to