Hi Yiu, On 2012/06/25, at 12:40, Lee, Yiu wrote:
> Dear Satoru, > > I do not understand how to create "per-subscriber mapping" in a stateless > manner. In the end, the BR must contain all mapping rules for all 1:1 > subscribers. This is stateful to my understanding. Could you please > explain how not to maintain any mapping rule in BR to achieve this? This could be same operation with any other, configure FMRs into a map tunnel. Nothing changed. cheers, --satoru > > Thanks and regards, > Yiu > > > On 6/24/12 10:27 PM, "Satoru Matsushima" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> No, that's a misunderstanding. >> Current MAP specify the case for ea-len is 'zero'. It is 'per-subscriber >> mapping' in stateless manner, not to introduce 'per-flow NAT binding' or >> 'per-subscriber state on demand'. >> _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
