Hi Bing, For the sake of progress, we cannot keep revisiting our decisions forever. The map-01 document is now under working group change control. I think the best way forward is to file this as an issue in the issue tracker and see what the wg thinks about this.
Thanks Suresh ________________________________________ From: Liubing (Leo) [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:40 PM To: Suresh Krishnan; Softwires WG Subject: RE: [Softwires] Document actions on MAP and 4rd Hi, Dear chairman About this item: > * map-01 will remove any descriptive text concerning the 1:1 mapping > rules from the -00 draft In MAP-00, the editors combined MAP-T and MAP-E together (which is only combined by words, they are still two solutions that carriers have to choose one). In my memory, this has not been discussed openly, neither reach WG consensus. So, may I venture to suggest this issue also backwarded to the original for discussion? B.R. Bing -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:16 PM To: Softwires WG Subject: [Softwires] Document actions on MAP and 4rd Hi all, There has been quite a bit of traffic on the mailing list as to whether the current map and 4rd drafts actually represent wg consensus. In order to clear the air around this, we have asked the map and the 4rd editors to revert to the revisions of the drafts that represent consensus. Specifically * map-01 will remove any descriptive text concerning the 1:1 mapping rules from the -00 draft * 4rd-02 will be identical to 4rd-u-06 The map-01 draft has been submitted and the 4rd-02 draft should be submitted soon. Thanks Suresh _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
