Hi James, Thank u for u comments. In some scenarios Anycast will be used for load balancing, not just one router is working. Hope it clarifies.
Tina On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:05 AM, "Huangjing" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, Tina, Regarding anycast, I think if only one of the routers with a same anycast address is working at any moment, and other(s) standby, then there is no ICMP error message problem. What do you think? Regards James For your comments. Tina Begin forwarded message: From: <internet-drafts at ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts%20at%20ietf.org>> Date: June 27, 2012 2:05:41 PM PDT To: <tina.tsou.zouting at huawei.com<mailto:tina.tsou.zouting%20at%20huawei.com>> Cc: <brandon.lijian at huawei.com<mailto:brandon.lijian%20at%20huawei.com>>, <repenno at cisco.com<mailto:repenno%20at%20cisco.com>>, <j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de<mailto:j.schoenwaelder%20at%20jacobs-university.de>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-tsou-softwire-bfd-ds-lite-03.txt A new version of I-D, draft-tsou-softwire-bfd-ds-lite-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Tina Tsou and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-tsou-softwire-bfd-ds-lite Revision: 03 Title: DS-Lite Failure Detection and Failover Creation date: 2012-06-27 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 9 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tsou-softwire-bfd-ds-lite-03.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tsou-softwire-bfd-ds-lite Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tsou-softwire-bfd-ds-lite-03 Diff: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-tsou-softwire-bfd-ds-lite-03 Abstract: In DS-Lite, the tunnel is stateless, not associated with any state information, and no failure detection and failover mechanism is available. This makes it difficult to manage and diagnose if there is a problem. This draft analyzes the applicability of some of the possible solutions. The IETF Secretariat ________________________________ * Prev by Date: Re: [Softwires] [SPAM] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-02<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/msg04551.html> * Next by Date: Re: [Softwires] [Softwire] draft-ietf-softwire-map-00 does NOT reflect the consensus from the WG<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/msg04553.html> * Previous by thread: [Softwires] map-00: review on the mode 1:1<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/msg04513.html> * Next by thread: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-01.txt<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/msg04568.html> * Index(es): * Date<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/maillist.html#04552> * Thread<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/threads.html#04552> Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
