Dear chairs, dear group, Some time after Paris it was decided that MAP should be adopted as a WG item. I assume that the general agreement is that this decision covers its companion document that specifies provisioning mechanism over DHCPv6 as well.
After Paris meeting work on DHCPv6 options continued. Two authors left, one joined. There was some editorial and non-editorial changes. Many of those changes are a result of following main MAP draft. Others are DHCPv6 clarifications. A separate option for DMR was defined. Port parameters option was slightly modified. That updated version was just uploaded as draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-03. You can use standard links to compare them, if you want to. It would be good to avoid hiccups similar to those encountered after -00 versions of ietf-softwire-map and ietf-softwire-4rd were posted. Taking this into consideration, I would like to ask the following: Which version should be uploaded as -00 WG document: the old one (-02, that was published in January) or the updated one (-03, with aforementioned changes)? I suppose that question is directed to chairs, but group's comments is welcome as well. If we decide to adopt -02, we will still need to do minor changes, namely removal of two authors who asked to be removed. All changes between -02 and -03 seems reasonable in authors' opinion, so we will be proposing to include them in future versions. If we decide to adopt -03, we will avoid extra work of going over all changes and getting them approved one by one. If any of the changes are considered controversial, we can remove them in the next revision if that is WG consensus. If you don't have any preference, I would recommend going with -03. Thanks in advance, Tomek _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
