On 07/10/2012 05:46 AM, Rémi Després wrote:
This draft contains valuable advices which can apply to 4rd as well as to
MAP-T+E, but is exclusively MAP oriented.
As such, I find it premature to move it to WG-draft status.
If 4rd is chosen for standardization, adapting this deployment draft to it
looks easy.
I therefore suggest to keep it as is for the time being (while pursuing
discussion on its contents).
I tend to agree with Rémi. The draft could also apply to 4rd very
easily: a search and replace, some minor modifications, and we're done.
If we eventually need to change what protocol this document applies to,
it would be better to do it before adoption rather than after. Just
because of process. We wouldn't want to deal with an objection late into
the process claiming that this draft diverged from the scope it had when
it was adopted, and maybe have to backtrack and do it all over again.
So I say we play it safe, wait for the MAP-vs-4rd situation to be
resolved, adjust the document as necessary, then adopt.
Assuming the MAP-vs-4rd situation gets resolved quickly (hint! hint!), a
small delay shouldn't be a problem.
My 2¢ Canadian.
Simon
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
