On 25 July 2012 16:13, Rémi Després <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Le 2012-07-25 à 15:59, Wojciech Dec (wdec) a écrit : > > > > > > > On 25/07/2012 15:47, "Rémi Després" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >>> take it to 6man. > >> > >> 6man has to be involved, sure, but Softwire should first be clear about > >> the purpose, and possible drawbacks if any. > >> If you see such drawbacks, please clarify. > > > > Here's one: > > I'd like my <insert name of your favorite device class> to be guaranteed > > *never ever* to conflict. Can I also get a V octet for > <$my_device_class>? > > Sorry I couldn't decipher this. > How many V-octets do you think the IETF should assign, and why should the V-octed belong to your proposed device/use-category? One may want the V-octet to be used for "Next gen TVs", etc. This is a problem & discussion for 6man, which has been said before... -Woj. > > RD > > > > > -Woj. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> RD > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >>> cheers, > >>> Ole > >>> > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
