On 24.08.2012 16:16, [email protected] wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : DHCPv6 Options for Mapping of Address and Port > Author(s) : Tomasz Mrugalski > Ole Troan > Congxiao Bao > Wojciech Dec > Leaf Y. Yeh > Filename : draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-01.txt > Pages : 16 > Date : 2012-08-24
Dear softwires! draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-03 passed adoption call in June and was adopted as draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-00. In the mean time, WG decided that 1:1 mode should be removed from the main MAP draft. It seemed reasonable that removing corresponding PORTPARAMS option between individual -03 and wg-00 is ok, so authors did then when uploading wg-00 draft. The chairs have informed authors that technically WG reached consensus on adopting idividual -03, not individual -03 + changes. Therefore this -01 draft is a revert back to invidual -03. Our belief is that this concludes the adoption process. Now that we are done with it, let's decide what to do with PORTPARAMS option. Simply speaking, PORTPARAMS option allow PSID configuration on a per-CPE basis. A simple, direct question to the interested WG participants: Do you want to keep PORTPARAMS option or get rid of it? Cheers, Tomek _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
