I figured it was time to pick on someone else, so I reviewed
draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite. I found it really easy to
understand, and all I found to change was a couple of typos.
Of course, one reason lw4o6 easier to read than MAP is because it does
not describe a port mapping algorithm. The other reason is because the
MAP document has to describe the EA bits and their use. But that's a
fundamental difference between the two approaches, and I can't see much
chance to simplify MAP. The only possibility is to change the
provisioning approach to provision the Rule IPv6 prefix, the complete
shared IPv4 address, and the PSID explicitly, then describe how to
construct the MAP endpoint IPv6 address.
Getting back to draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite, I'd say it's
ready to be adopted.
Tom Taylor
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
