Remi, > Conclusion: it is now clarified that, even if 1:1 with shared addresses has > to be covered, there is no need for any MAP-E prefix longer than 64 bits. > > Consequence: the sentence about overwriting "the most significant parts of > the interface identifier" in case of such extra-long prefixes, isn't needed. > It should be deleted.
that doesn't follow, and the above discussion is a different point. can we please hold back a little and let other people in the working group voice their opinion? cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
