Hi all, I would like to draw your attention to this draft that has been submitted to the dhc working group and has relevance to softwire. Please take a look at the draft and chime in on the dhc mailing list if you have any comments. The draft can be found here
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rajtar-dhc-v4configuration-00 Thanks Suresh -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-rajtar-dhc-v4configuration Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:24:13 +0000 From: Ted Lemon <[email protected]> To: [email protected] WG <[email protected]> At the IETF meeting in Atlanta, we ended the session with a long discussion about how to solve the problem of configuring MAP-E and lw4over6 IPv4 stacks; several possibilities were presented, and we decided that we would write a draft summarizing these possibilities so that the working group could state a preference. Time went on, and none of the people who volunteered actually did anything, so a couple of weeks ago Branimir Rajtar and Ian Farrer offered to write it up based on the notes from the last meeting. They have done so, and submitted a -00 draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajtar-dhc-v4configuration/ The purpose of this draft is to enumerate all the potential solutions to this problem, describe their pros and cons, and make a recommendation. The current state of the draft is the recommendation that most people seemed to be leaning toward at the end of the meeting in Atlanta, but it's not binding; if during discussion the working group decides to recommend something else, the document will be updated to reflect that. If you think the working group should in fact produce this document, please say so on the mailing list. If you think we shouldn't produce such a document, please also say so. If you have comments on the content of the document, please hold off on that until it's been adopted, or not adopted. If it's not adopted, the comments are moot; if it is adopted, the job of the working group will be to finish it according to the input of working group participants, which is where your comments would come in. We will evaluate consensus on February 25. Thanks! _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
