Ian, > So, are we in agreement on the following points? > > * A MAP-CE only has one way of configuring 1:1 mode. > * There should only be a single way of provisioning 1:1 mode. > > If so, then the unified CPE draft describes a single method for > provisioning 1:1 mode irrespective of the underlying implementation method > (MAP-E & lw4o6). MAP-E should then use this method for provisioning its > 1:1 mode and EA=0 as the way that it is implemented.
yes, I think so. while the MAP mode is configured with the BMR/Rule IPv4 prefix. that doesn't force how the bits are represented in the provisioning option of course. Best, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
