You were in the CC list of the mail below but, for some reason I don't know, your names disappeared in the mail forwarded to the WG, and stored in the archive. Sorry for that. RD
Le 2013-03-01 à 14:16, Rémi Després <[email protected]> a écrit : > 2013-02-28 15:34, Qiong <[email protected]> : > >> ... >> Currently, the title of this draft is still MAP only, as we have not found a >> good term to call MAP-E, MAP-T and 4rd-u. So we would like to get advice >> from the working group to address this problem. > > Thanks to Qiong for raising this question in a more general context than that > of MAP-E issue # 18 (http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/softwire/trac/ticket/18) > > AFAIK, Alain's intention before he left was to move from MAP-E/MAP-T/4rd-U to > 4rd-E/4rd-T/4rd-H (with H for Hybrid). IMHO, this does make sense because: > - "IPv4 Residual Deployment" better reflects the solution scope than "Address > and Port Mapping". > - This nicely conveys that there is commonality with 6rd. > > The fact that "MAP" has been used for some time for both MAP-E and MAP-T can > be considered an impediment, but: > - Now is a good time for making a consistent choice for the future. > - Editorial updates for this are essentially trivial. > NB: The original acronym for MAP-E was 4rd (and that of MAP-T was 4via6). > > This is my 2-cents contribution on this naming issue (after so many > contributions to build and improve the solution). > > Best regards, > RD > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
