Dear Suresh, Many thanks for your valuable comments on the draft. We will revise the document and fix all the issues. Once the submission system is available again, we will submit a new version asap.
Best Regards, Peng On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi authors, > I reviewed this document and it has some minor MIB issues (warnings) > that need to be fixed before advancement. Specifically > > * swmEncapsEIPDst should be not-accessible (as it is index element of > swmEncapsEntry) > * swmEncapsEIPMask should be not-accessible (as it is index element of > swmEncapsEntry) > * swmBGPNeighborInetAddress should be not-accessible (as it is index > element of swmBGPNeighborEntry) > * Please check if all the InetAddress objects have an accompanying > (preceding) InetAdressType object. > > Please fix these issues when you get a chance and submit a new revision > so that we can advance this document. > > Thanks > Suresh > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
