Hi all, +1 support. This Lw4o6 is considered useful for unicast traffic transition solution.
In addition, I think we should also address Multicast transition solution (MLDv2<->IGMPv3 and Multicast-v6<->Multicast-v4 in WG. Regards.. -Shailesh On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Lee, Yiu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On 3/19/13 1:13 PM, "Suresh Krishnan" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >Hi all, > > This draft was presented during the softwire WG meeting at IETF86 and > >a subsequent poll of the room indicated that there was strong support > >for adopting this draft as a WG document. > > > >This call is being initiated to confirm whether there is WG consensus > >towards adoption of draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite-11 as a > >softwire WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the > >adoption by replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please also > >state your objections in your response. This adoption call will complete > >on 2013-04-02. > > > >Regards > >Suresh & Yong > >_______________________________________________ > >Softwires mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
