Likewise, RA options for translation multicast prefixes is worthy of attention.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:29 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Support! > > RADIUS Extensions of multicast-prefix-option is worthy of attention too. > Thanks. > > Wei > > > > > [email protected] 写于 2013-03-26 12:27:35: > > > > Hi all, > > This message starts a two week softwire working group last call on > > advancing the draft defining the DHCPv6 Option for IPv4-Embedded > > Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes as a Standards Track RFC. The > > authors believe that this version has addressed all the issues raised on > > the document. The latest version of the draft is available at > > > > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-03.txt > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-03 > > > > Substantive comments and statements of support/opposition for advancing > > this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial > > suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. The chairs will send in > > their comments as well during the last call period. This last call will > > conclude on April 9, 2013. > > > > Regards, > > Suresh & Yong > > _______________________________________________ > > Softwires mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
