Tom, > In the previous note, I meant the BMR used as FMR, to be technical. But > here's another point from the same section: > > The length of r MAY be zero, in which case the complete IPv4 address > or prefix is encoded in the EA bits. If only a part of the IPv4 > address/prefix is encoded in the EA bits, the Rule IPv4 prefix is > provisioned to the CE by other means (e.g. a DHCPv6 option). > > Question: does that second sentence also assume r = 0? If so, I think you've > moved beyond what makes sense to document as part of MAP-E. Given that you > have the MAP-E BMR mechanism, why wouldn't you use it?
no, the second sentence assumes r > 0. "If only a part of the IPv4 address is encoded...", implies that the other part comes via the BMR. cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
