Hi Tom, Please see inline.
Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la >part de Tom Taylor >Envoyé : vendredi 29 mars 2013 17:12 >À : Softwires >Objet : Re: [Softwires] MUST or must for /96 in draft-ietf-softwire- >multicast-prefix-option-03? > >Apologies, that second question is covered thoroughly by client >behaviour, section 5. [Med] That's fine. Thanks for double checking it. > >On 29/03/2013 12:05 PM, Tom Taylor wrote: >> I actually have two questions about the prefix-length fields in the >option. >> >> First, in section 4, there is the statement: >> >> When ASM_PREFIX64 and SSM_PREFIX64 are configured, the length of >> these prefixes must be /96. >> >> Is that meant to be a MUST? [Med] The normative language is not used in that section as it provides only guidelines. You may noticed, we didn't entitled that section "Server Behavior". This is a comment I have received from T. Lemon for another document. >> >> The second question is whether the absence of a particular prefix from a >> particular option is indicated by a prefix length of zero. If so, should >> that be mentioned somewhere in section 3, or is it covered by standard >> DHCP practice? >> >> Tom Taylor >_______________________________________________ >Softwires mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
