Dear all, (I cc sofwtire as this work is also relevant for the working group.)
I do not support this work as it induces more complexity compared to just defining adequate option in dhcpv6. Defining one container or few DHCPv6 options is much more simpler that the proposed approach. Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de >Tomek Mrugalski >Envoyé : mercredi 3 avril 2013 19:41 >À : [email protected] >Objet : [dhcwg] Adoption call on draft-scskf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6 > >Hi all, > >This draft is a result of the discussion we had during last meeting in >Orlando. We have very productive discussion about IPv4 hosts >configuration in IPv6-only network. After we reached what looked like a >consensus in the meeting room, couple folks volunteered to write down >the draft that summarizes that perceived consensus. This draft is a >product of this effort. > >As requested by authors, we are announcing adotion call on >draft-scskf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-01. This call is being initiated to >confirm whether there is WG consensus to adopt this work as DHC WG >draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by >replying to this mail. If you are not in favor, please also state your >objections in your response. This adoption call will complete on 2013-04- >17. > >Regards, >Bernie & Tomek > >On 03.04.2013 19:20, Marcin Siodelski wrote: >> In the name of authors of draft-scskf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6 I am asking >> for adoption of this document by DHC WG. >> >> The latest version (-01) is available here: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-scskf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6- >01.txt >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-scskf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-01 >> >> This document describes a mechanism whereby IPv4 client obtains its >> configuration from the DHCPv4 server separated from the client by IPv6- >> only network having DHCPv6 service. This mechanism is frequently >> referred as "DHCPv4-over-DHCPv6". >> >> The DHCPv4 client's request is carried in the newly defined DHCPv6 >> messages/option to/from the server and can be sent either through a >> relay or directly. >> >> Cheers, >> Marcin >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dhcwg mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg >> > >_______________________________________________ >dhcwg mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
