Cameron,

> My concern is at the rogue MAP CE.  Thus, the spoof protection
> filtering should be applied at the attachment PE so that the rogue MAP
> CE attempts at spoofing can squashed at the provider edge.
> 
> Make sense?

yes, that was what I meant too (albeit not what I wrote ;-)).
the receiving consistency check has to be done both on BR and CE.

cheers,
Ole
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to