Woj, I am not objecting it. I just stated the new draft has been updated the scope w/o getting explicit consent from the ML.
BR, Yiu From: Wojciech Dec <[email protected]> Date: Monday, July 15, 2013 12:01 PM To: "Yiu L. LEE" <[email protected]> Cc: Softwires-wg <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Softwires] Changes to DHCP MAP Option draft Yes. See Mail of July 8. So far your objection is the only one, although I don't quite see in it any technically grounded objection. A fair bit of discussions between authors (MAP and lw46), softwire & dhc chairs, and WG participants have taken place, and naturally will also be held in Berlin. Re-spinning draft versions is easy. On 15 July 2013 17:29, Lee, Yiu <[email protected]> wrote: > Since this is a WG draft, did the authors ask the WG to update this? When the > WG accepted this draft, it was only for MAP. But seems the scope has been > changed. This should start as an Individual draft. I will recommend to revert > back to the last version and present this in Berlin to replace the MAP draft > if the WG agrees with it. > > > From: Wojciech Dec <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, July 11, 2013 10:43 AM > To: Qi Sun <[email protected]> > Cc: Softwires-wg <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Softwires] Changes to DHCP MAP Option draft > > > Yes, there was a long thread started by Tomek. Given that the option is > applicable beyond MAP a *suggestion* was to rename it. I'm personally ok > either way. The "Softwire46" option is the currently proposed name. > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
