I reviewed this draft and support it's adoption. Some comments about it: - I believe there is a typo error: typed sixRdSecurityCeck instead of sixRdSecurityCheck all over the draft - In the introduction, shouldn't it be explicit that this same MIB supports both CPE and BR?
Regards, Edwin Em 29/05/13 21:40, Lee, Yiu escreveu: > Support > > On 5/24/13 8:56 AM, "Yong Cui" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG >> consensus towards adoption of draft-cai-softwire-6rd-mib-05 as a >> softwire WG draft. >> >> Please state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by replying >> to this email. If you are not in favor, please also state your objections >> in your response. >> >> The call will complete at midnight PDT on 2013-06-02. >> >> >> Regards >> Suresh & Yong >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
