Hi Softwires, Ales presented draft-byrne-v6ops-clatip-01 in softwires at the last IETF meeting.
I am attempting to have this I-D adopted by v6ops, but v6ops requested feedback from softwires first. Pertaining to the minutes, i would like to address some topics to make sure it is ok for v6ops to move forward with adoption https://tools.ietf.org/wg/softwire/minutes?item=minutes-89-softwire.html The addresses, both in DS-lite and 464xlat, never appears on the wire so there is no chance of overlap or collision. There is also no need to expand the range from /29 to a /28. Both DS-lite and 464XLAT only emit IPv6 packets on the wire towards the network. Are there other concerns that need to be brought up? I believe it is best to keep the existing /29, aim of this draft is to simply generalize the description of the range in the IANA register. Best regards, Cameron _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
