This may be a silly question or a lack of my understanding, but why an experimental RFC over just a Standard RFC?
[cid:[email protected]] Matt Petersen | Sr. Director Engineering | 303.323.1356 6399 S. Fiddlers Green Circle, 6th Floor | Greenwood Village, CO 80111 From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 11:48 PM To: Petersen, Matt J; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: MAP-T Status Hi Matt, MAP-T has completed working group last call and will be progressed to the iesg for publication as an experimental RFC right after the Standards track stateless solutions(MAP-E and lw4over6) are progressed. Thanks Suresh "Petersen, Matt J" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: All, What is the status of MAP-T becoming ratified. Charter is in the process of evaluating MAP-T as a viable transition technology and looking to possibly deploy the technology within the 2nd half of 2014. Thanks [cid:[email protected]] Matt Petersen | Sr. Director Engineering | 303.323.1356 6399 S. Fiddlers Green Circle, 6th Floor | Greenwood Village, CO 80111
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
