Hi Ian,

I think this problem is still valid. 

IPv6 transition might be a relatively long process. Different requirements may 
be raised as time goes on. When remained IPv4 is quite scare, dynamic manage 
management of IPv4-IPv6 bindings might necessary. As the scale of IPv6 network 
enlarges and the number of recycled IPv4 addresses increases, static 
configuration of v4-v6 binding would be more convenient. Rather than replacing 
CPEs all the time, I would prefer a CPE prepares for those potential 
requirements. And a logic for mechanisms selecting is necessary.

Thanks,
Qi



On Aug 20, 2014, at 8:20 PM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> At the last Softwire meeting in Toronto, I presented a question around 
> whether the expired Unified CPE draft needs to be brought back to life 
> (http://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-softwire-unified-cpe-01.txt). 
> There was little support for this during the meeting, so I’m taking it to the 
> list to gauge if there’s wider interest in this problem.
>  
> Currently in our network we are facing some of the problems that the Unified 
> CPE intended to solve. Specifically, we will have DS-Lite, lw4o6 and public 
> 4over6 in the operator network. The deployed HGWs may support DS-Lite only 
> (RFC6204 compliant ‘off-the-shelf’ CPEs) or may be capable of all three. A 
> individual HGW may also need to use different mechanisms at different points 
> in its lifecycle (e.g. lw4o6 initially, but public 4over6 if the customer is 
> located a full IPv4 address to use with non A+P compatible L4 protocols)
>  
> So, my questions here are whether there are other operators (or vendors) that 
> see problems of this type in their networks, and is there enough interest to 
> open up the unified CPE problem again?
>  
> Thanks,
> Ian
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to