Dear authors，
I've read this document and think it is a good way to inform the server of
clients' source addresses.
Also, I have a comment,
In section 3,
'Then the OPTION_S46_CONT_DHCP4O6 MAY be included in DHCPv4-query and
DHCPv4-response messages.'
Do you think it is more appropriate to replace the 'MAY' by 'SHOULD'? As in the
section 5.1 of [I-D.ietf-softwire-lw4over6], it describes that the Border
Router's IPv6 address must be provisioned to the lwB4.
Best regards,
Linhui Sun
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
