On Nov 13, 2014, at 6:29 AM, Rémi Després <[email protected]> wrote: > If the IESG, now proposes 2 standards instead of 1, that’s a choice I view as > based on a misunderstanding.
The IESG proposes one standard with three profiles or, if you prefer, three standards instead of two. > I therefore vote against a WG support of this proposal. You were not asked for a vote. You were asked if you had any technical objection: some reason why MAP-T might have interop problems or operational problems and thus ought to be only an experiment and not a standard. A process objection would also be viable, but as I've explained, I don't think there _is_ a process objection you could raise here. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
