Ted, I support the move to PS, and agree with the characterisation you presented.
Thanks, Wojciech. On 11 November 2014 22:11, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear softwire participants, > > As we've gotten closer to finally finishing the stateless address-sharing > suite of softwire specifications, I've had to explain what happened to a > number of different people, both in the directorates and on the IESG, and > even to nomcom. As a consequence I've had to do a lot of thinking about > why things wound up the way they did, and whether what happened was the > right outcome. > > As a result of the directorate reviews and the IESG review, it became > clear that the plan to advance MAP-T as experimental didn't make sense. > The three solutions, MAP-E, MAP-T and Lightweight 4over6 actually make a > lot of sense when presented together. Because of this there is no reason > that one should be experimental and the other two standards track. > > I would therefore like the working group to consider changing the proposed > status of MAP-T to Proposed Standard. I think this would be a less > confusing outcome. If the working group agrees, we would go through a > second IETF last call and then advance the document. > > I have not made the same suggestion with respect to 4RD because it > actually is quite different from the other three documents. This is not > intended as an editorial comment about 4RD: rather, it's simply that I > think the three documents together offer a good suite of solutions that can > be understood and implemented together, whereas 4RD is essentially its own > solution. I think the working group has already chosen to advance the > MAP-style lightweight solutions, and it would actually be confusing to > advance 4RD as a separate standard solution. > > Suresh and Cui Yong will be asking the working group to weigh in on this > issue, and then assuming no blocking objections are raised we will re-do > the IETF last call for map-t as a proposed standard. > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
