Dear all, 

We’ve submitted a draft about handling multiple endpoints on one BR instance. 
This would benefit operators with the requirement for grouping traffic based on 
tunnel endpoint IPv6 address, as well as achieving high availability. 

Comments are always welcome.

Cheers,
Qi

Begin forwarded message:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Montag, 9. März 2015 17:45
> To: Sun, Qui; Farrer, Ian; Farrer, Ian; Sun, Qui
> Subject: New Version Notification for 
> draft-farrer-softwire-br-multiendpoints-00.txt
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-farrer-softwire-br-multiendpoints-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Qi Sun and posted to the IETF repository.
> 
> Name:         draft-farrer-softwire-br-multiendpoints
> Revision:     00
> Title:                Multiple Tunnel Endpoints on Border Router
> Document date:        2015-03-09
> Group:                Individual Submission
> Pages:                6
> URL:            
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrer-softwire-br-multiendpoints-00.txt
> Status:         
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrer-softwire-br-multiendpoints/
> Htmlized:       
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrer-softwire-br-multiendpoints-00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document defines a mechanism to enable an IPv4-over-IPv6
>   Softwire Border Router to support multiple tunnel endpoint on one BR
>   instance.  This feature can be used to group users based on IPv6
>   tunnel endpoint addresses and achieve high availability.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission 
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to