Hi Qin,
Thanks for your review. With regard to your second comment (reference
rfc6087), the definitions of the symbols just described in
'draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-01' rather than rfc6087, so we decide to add
these symbols definitions in our next version until the bis becomes the RFC and
reference it again.
Regards,
Hao
2015-03-13
Hao Wang
发件人：Ian Farrer <[email protected]>
发送时间：2015-03-13 01:12
主题：Re: [Softwires] Review of draft-sun-softwire-yang-02
收件人："Qin Wu"<[email protected]>
抄送："[email protected]"<[email protected]>
Hi Qin,
Thanks for your comments. Please see inline.
Cheers,
Ian
On 12 Mar 2015, at 08:53, Qin Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear all,
I have read this document and think the softwire yang model is needed for the
configuration and management of Softwire BRs and CPEs.
A few comments below:
In section 3.2, why the binding-ipv6-addr and binding-ipv6-prefix are both
contained in the binding-table?
[if] The intention here is to allow for the binding table to be specified in
one of two ways, either with an explicit /128 or a /64 with the IID
automatically constructed from the IPv4 address and port set.
Looking at the model again, the way that it is currently defined is wrong.
Here’s an updated section of the model that should achieve the above:
| +--rw (binding-v6info)
| | +—:(ipv6addr)
| | | +--rw binding-ipv6-addr inet:ipv6-address
| | +—:(ipv6pref)
| | +--rw binding-ipv6-prefix inet:ipv6-prefix
In section 1.1, in RFC6087, I don't see the definitions of the symbols used in
these diagrams. Is the reference RFC6087 correct?
[if] Good spot. We’ll remove this reference in the next version.
For the title of "2.3 Lightweight 4over6 lwB4", I think "lwB4" should be
uppercase to get consistent with "ATFR”.
[if] The capitalisation in draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6 uses the terms ‘lwB4’
and ‘lwAFTR’ throughout, so the intention is to be consistent with this.
-Qin
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
