Hi Stig, Please see inline.
Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Stig Venaas [mailto:[email protected]] > Envoyé : mercredi 18 janvier 2017 19:27 > À : Lee, Yiu > Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN; [email protected]; draft-ietf-softwire- > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Objet : Re: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-14.txt > > Hi > > The good version looks pretty good. But I noticed one more thing that > you might want to change. I'll leave it to you. > > 8.1.1. The MLD Querier is Co-Located with the mAFTR > > The mAFTR can embed the MLD Querier function (as well as the PIMv6 > DR) for optimization purposes. > > I'm wondering if you should say IPv6 DR or PIMv6 DR instead. As you > write after the heading, it must be co-located with the DR as well. > Normally the querier would be the same router, but the querier could > be another router on the link. [Med] Do you suggest to replace in the title "MLD Querier" with "PIMv6 DR"? > > Then we have this section: > > 8.1.2. The DR is Co-Located with the mAFTR > > In the text you talk about the DR connected to the IPv4 source. Hence > it is the first hop DR, and IPv4 DR. I'm wondering if it is worth > saying IPv4 DR or something in the title to distinguish it from the > other DR. Basically we have first hop DR and last hop DR, or if you > like IPv4 DR and IPv6 DR. > [Med] Makes sense to be explicit here. I changed DR to IPv4 DR. > I'm leaving it to you to decide. This is the only remaining issue I > can find. There is a typo at the end of Appendix B though. It say > "Noet". [Med] Fixed it. Thanks. > > Stig > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Stig Venaas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sounds good, I'll still try to have another look when you post the > > next revision. > > > > Stig _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
